cellboy: (Dali)
cellboy ([personal profile] cellboy) wrote2011-09-16 02:53 pm
  • Add Memory
  • Share This Entry

:)

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

[identity profile] jeremytblack.livejournal.com 2011-09-17 02:56 am (UTC)(link)
Technically speaking, this statement isn't true.

[identity profile] frankbook.livejournal.com 2011-09-18 03:26 am (UTC)(link)
I was about to echo this sentiment.

[identity profile] cellboy.livejournal.com 2011-09-18 03:37 am (UTC)(link)
LOL!

[identity profile] fallenandlost76.livejournal.com 2011-09-17 05:44 am (UTC)(link)
Sometimes I would agree and sometimes not. ;-) it depends on who is the one you can see the underwear of course. :-)

[identity profile] the-hyde-inside.livejournal.com 2011-09-17 05:22 pm (UTC)(link)
Everybody wants to see me in my underwear. Probably because I don't wear baggy-ass boxers so large they take two people to fold.

[identity profile] cellboy.livejournal.com 2011-09-17 08:11 pm (UTC)(link)
Boo for baggy boxers. Yay for a bit of crack tease :)

On talk radio last year some fashion guy was saying that baggys/saggys are out. Not many are wearing them on the East Coast, and the West Coast is behind in what's in. That I don't know. But still see them here

[identity profile] frankbook.livejournal.com 2011-09-18 03:29 am (UTC)(link)
I've been thinking baggys/saggys have been out for more than a decade now, but apparently, there are some circles that still find it fashionable.

I never sagged, but there are a couple years in the 90s (8th through 10th grades) when I'd wear "beyond baggy" pants. Ha. So ridiculous.
Flat | Top-Level Comments Only