Date: 2011-09-17 02:56 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jeremytblack.livejournal.com
Technically speaking, this statement isn't true.

Date: 2011-09-17 05:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fallenandlost76.livejournal.com
Sometimes I would agree and sometimes not. ;-) it depends on who is the one you can see the underwear of course. :-)

Date: 2011-09-17 05:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] the-hyde-inside.livejournal.com
Everybody wants to see me in my underwear. Probably because I don't wear baggy-ass boxers so large they take two people to fold.

Date: 2011-09-17 08:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cellboy.livejournal.com
Boo for baggy boxers. Yay for a bit of crack tease :)

On talk radio last year some fashion guy was saying that baggys/saggys are out. Not many are wearing them on the East Coast, and the West Coast is behind in what's in. That I don't know. But still see them here

Date: 2011-09-18 03:26 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] frankbook.livejournal.com
I was about to echo this sentiment.

Date: 2011-09-18 03:29 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] frankbook.livejournal.com
I've been thinking baggys/saggys have been out for more than a decade now, but apparently, there are some circles that still find it fashionable.

I never sagged, but there are a couple years in the 90s (8th through 10th grades) when I'd wear "beyond baggy" pants. Ha. So ridiculous.

Date: 2011-09-18 03:37 am (UTC)

Profile

cellboy: (Default)
cellboy

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 24th, 2026 05:42 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios